Thursday, April 7, 2011

Pecha Kucha Presentation Selections

Video 1

This was my favourite presentation due to the presenter's comical approach to a subtle theme. He jabs a wide variety of people and situations with his use of structural design, using everything from subtlety to slapstick inanity to crack a joke.

Video 2

This man's presentation on one his process of thinking, sketching, and crafting ideas was particularly engaging because of the strong connection to our previous discussions regarding design. Much of what he discussed was familiar to me, making the process of connecting with his presentation easier.

Video 3

I found the presenter's differentiation between complexity and complication in the way people approach and deal with situations intriguing. He localizes the definitions of the two in relation to one another rather than particular situations which helps to see the difference between the two approaches to problem-solving.

Thursday, March 31, 2011

TED Lecture Posts

http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/david_merrill_demos_siftables_the_smart_blocks.html

David Merrill demos Siftables

This lecture started off interesting, but got much better as the presenter delved deeper into the technical capabilities of these motion-sensing digital domino-like devices. The siftables are basically just small square computers with motion sensors and infrared monitors built into them. Each computer talks to the other computers to create an environment conducive to interacting computing. Specifically, the purpose was to help manipulate digital information using newer, more efficient, and more user-friendly interfaces. From utilizing motion and light sensors to “mix” digital colours to new means of approaching song creation, these little computers open up interesting possibilities for future computer interfaces that are better designed to facilitate motion as the primary means of interaction with digital media through computers. Basically, we want to be able to tell what computers do in the quickest, most efficient manner available. These little trinkets look like they will contribute to advancing the ergonomics of digital interfaces and their efficacy in providing users with intuitive designs and easy use.



http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity.html

Ken Robinson says schools kill creativity




I recalled thinking fondly of the previous lecture we heard by Ken Robinson on education so I approached this lecture hoping to hear some greater depth on the matter. Unfortunately, the 20 minute video was probably a solid 10-12 minutes of random jokes, audience banter/pandering, and tangents, none of which added anything to the actual presentation on the importance of creativity in education. Robinson’s rail against the established hierarchy of studies and established approach to modern “education” falls on my friendly ears, but I would have enjoyed the lecture much more had it remained far more focused and pointed and structured with some type of visual aid to help communicate the idea. I liked Robinson’s three-point definition of intelligence as varied, dynamic, and distinct – I think that shows a good, well-rounded understanding of an individual’s analytical abilities. And as always, I found myself agreeing with his closing call to rediscover the richness of human capacity in order to being servicing a new fundamental approach to education.





http://www.ted.com/talks/jeff_han_demos_his_breakthrough_touchscreen.html

Jeff Jan demos his breakthrough touchscreen

I enjoyed this presentation for many of the same reasons I liked the siftables talk: the speaker concentrated his efforts on communicating how the advanced touch screen serves to create a user-friendlier interface. The multi-point contact touch screen seems to be the new way of introducing and understanding a more intuitive approach to computing, as opposed to trimming down the size and price of modern point-and-click systems. The speaker isn’t nearly as engaging as Ken Robinson, but delivers an amiable presentation with passion. It is also nice to hear him remark on the nature of the future of such interface technologies; too often people don’t keep pace with their inventiveness and new ideas and technology can be hampered by non-friendly user accessibility. The approach to how we use technology is just as important as its utility.

Friday, March 11, 2011

Two Reviews of Classmates' Trips

RYAN FRAZIER - FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT EXHIBIT

I enjoyed Ryan's choice of POINT and LINE for his new words as they related to the Organic Architecture Exhibit of Frank Lloyd Wright's designs. It was interesting to compare how my choices of BALANCE and MODERN compared with POINT and LINE - all four words seem to be strong visual cues in defining Wright's unique approach to architectural design.

RONNIE CRUTCHFIELD - MMOCA

Ronnie's exhaustive approach to unraveling the ideas behind HARMONY and COMPOSITION is intriguing. He gets a good breadth of answers from the four people he interviewed and the definitions appear well thought out. His detailed experience of first laying eyes upon Shinique Smith Menagerie's "Favorites of the Gods" is inspiring and informative. One can imagine, based on Ronnie's description, the enormity of the impact seeing the digital image in real life must have had on him, and others.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

The Field Trip - Milwaukee

Frank Lloyd Wright Exhibit - Milwaukee Art Museum

I interviewed a group of four family members - a grandfather, grandmother, young boy, and young girl. I didn't get their names because I wanted to make the interview quick, so as to avoid spoiling their visit. I split the words MODERN and BALANCE between the grandfather and young girl and the grandmother and young boy, respectively. In this way I hoped to maximize the breadth of perspectives between the two words and people of different ages and genders.

DEFINITIONS

MODERN

Grandfather - "Ideas that keep pace with the times"
Young Girl - "The Future?"

BALANCE

Grandmother - "Putting life into perspective and staying in that mindset"
Young Boy - "Not falling over or tripping over yourself"

OBSERVATIONS

The following are observational sketches of Frank Lloyd Wright's designs classified by MODERN or BALANCE as I believed they fit best:

MODERN


BALANCE


Thursday, February 17, 2011

Restaurant Visit

Restaurant Trip (Zaffiro's in Mequon)

Timeline of Events:

- arrived at about 100 PM, sat at the bar
- made note of dreary-sounding light jazz music being pumped through the speakers
- made note of only a family of four and an elderly couple occupying the restaurant - I thought this interesting as there seemed to be at least one person of each stage of life (toddler, child, young adult, adult, senior)
- ordered turkey panini and a diet pepsi - small talk made with the waitress, with whom I was prior to this visit acquainted
- after putting in my order, the family paid their bill and left, leaving quite a mess behind on the table - more than I would argue was reasonable for them to have left
- Made some more small talk and banter with other staff members I was acquainted with before this visit
- about 15 minutes later my meal arrived, which I promptly began to eat
- I noticed a relative mediocrity to the food - not amazing, but done well enough and with enough care that I didn't think it worth it to complain
- it smelled of grease and fat despite a lack of leakage on my hands, but a single bite confirmed my olfactory system's theory - there was far more grease than I anticipated
- as I tried enjoying my meal, I observed a large poster of painted bricks with a "Zaffiro's" logo on the west wall of the restaurant - I thought it and the plastic ferns tacky
- while eating, an older gentleman entered the restaurant, sat at the other end of the bar from me, and ordered a beer
- after a final chatting engagement, my waitress brought me my check after about half an hour to 35 minutes from my initial arrival
- I left a $10, leaving her a healthy tip with it
- after saying a few more goodbyes, I left and returned home




Questions:

1. What are the connections between food, art, and culture?

There is a vend-diagram-style relationship, with each component influencing the other. There is an interrelationship between the three - art influences how food is created and the process used to create it, as well as utilizing culture to influence how we think of food. Culture drives art to new, unexplored territory, and dictates what defines "good eating". The linkages go on and on.

2. What are the connections between food, design, and culture?

The same as those connections with art, food, and culture, but more narrowly focused on particular elements of art, not the general practice.

3. Where do you find design in this "context"?

As a component of art, design, in this "context", is in everything all around us, wherever we go. Any more narrow a definition begins to drag in particular cultural perspectives that distort the discernment of design from being understood.

4. How do you define design?

Design is the markings of something created by an artist - the residue of creation and ideation, usually tangible, but sometimes not so much.

5. How do you define art?

Art is anything that gives an individual's life meaning.

6. Are the definitions separate or do they overlap? In what way? Describe.

Design is a microcosm of art and as such, the two concepts overlap with design residing in art's frame. They are intrinsically tethered - one cannot exist without the other. Art cannot be made without some sense of design philosophy on the part of the artist and design cannot be left behind unless art is being created. In addition, design helps fuel ideation and the creation of new art, which in turns produces more design. By these two definitions, art and design are cyclically bound by their natures.

"How To Look At Halos" Notes

- the 22 Degree Halo is a brownish-blue corona that forms around the sun and/or moon when water suspended in clouds freezes
- these mostly occur in colder regions or during winter time

It is interesting that the interior arcs of these halos will never exist all in the same sky at once - the rarity of these phenomena is so profound that Elkins supposes some people merely hallucinate their own viewings of the halos (but surely there is a more qualitative scientific reasoning for their scarcity?)

I am intrigued that although Robert Greenler's book extensively maps the formation of these halos and their arcs, he fails to make a distinct connection in the most famous recording of the phenomena in the 18th century by Tobias Lowitz.

I think, as Elkins, that the mysterious and undiscovered elements of these halos creation and existence lends them a provocative voice. It speaks wonders to how we look at things that sometimes the less known about something makes it more appealing to us. If we could reason through how all these arcs are created and map out how, when, and where they would form, it would perhaps dull their effect on us.

On the other hand, an inability to explain such a phenomenon does not automatically bestow value on it as an art. It could also be said that whatever  appeal is lost as a result of a comprehensive understanding of these arcs' formation is compensated by our newfound ability to realize and understand our environment. That is to say, by understanding the process we better appreciate the product.